Vitamix Blender Comparison: Every 2026 Matchup, Settled
Most people who land here have already narrowed down their Vitamix selection to two machines and gotten stuck.
I understand completely. Vitamix machines are more alike than differentβsame blending DNA, same build qualityβso once you’re down to two finalists, the spec sheets start to blur, and every review seems to say “they’re both great!” True, and completely useless when you’re the one holding a credit card.
So this post does one thing: it settles ties. Below are the matchups I actually get asked about, and for each one I’ll give you the verdict first, then the reasoning, then a simple “choose this one if⦔ breakdown. I’ve been using Vitamix nearly every day for almost two decades, so these are working opinions, not spec-sheet recitations.
Two quick pointers before the first bell rings. If you haven’t narrowed anything down yet, start with my best Vitamix blender guideβthat’s where I rank the line-up. And if you just want to understand what all the model names mean, my Vitamix models guide is the map. This post is for when it’s down to two and you need a winner.
Table of Contents
- Vitamix Comparison Chart: All Current Models
- Ascent X2 vs X3 vs X4 vs X5: Climbing the Flagship Ladder
- Vitamix VX1 vs 5200: New Kid vs The Legend
- Propel 750 vs Ascent X2: The Value Play vs The Platform Play
- Propel 510 vs VX1: Programs vs Power
- New vs Certified Reconditioned: Full Price vs Smart Price
- Old Ascent vs Ascent X: Should A3500 (and A2500) Owners Upgrade?
- Quick-Fire Round
- Still Tied?
Vitamix Comparison Chart: All Current Models
Here is the entire current full-size lineup on one spec sheetβmotor, controls, container, and warranty for all eight machines Vitamix sells today. It wonβt tell you which to buy (the matchups below do that), but itβs the fastest way to see how any two stack up at a glance. For the full story on each series, see my Vitamix models guide; for current pricing and promotions, the deals page stays updated.
| Model | Motor | Controls & programs | Container | Warranty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ascent X2 | 2.2 HP | Dial + buttons, 3 programs | 48-oz SELF-DETECT™ | 10 yr |
| Ascent X3 | 2.2 HP | Touch panel, 3 programs | 48-oz SELF-DETECT™ | 10 yr |
| Ascent X4 | 2.2 HP | Touch panel, 5 programs + self-clean | 48-oz SELF-DETECT™ | 10 yr |
| Ascent X5 | 2.2 HP | Touch panel, 10 programs + self-clean | 48-oz SELF-DETECT™ | 10 yr |
| Propel 510 | 2.0 HP | Dial + pulse, 3 programs | 48-oz | 5 yr |
| Propel 750 | 2.2 HP | Dial, 5 programs + self-clean | 64-oz low-profile | 7 yr |
| VX1 | 2.2 HP | 10-speed dial + pulse + self-clean | 64-oz tall | 5 yr |
| 5200 | 2.0 HP | Dial + high/low switch | 64-oz tall | 7 yr |
Ascent X2 vs X3 vs X4 vs X5: Climbing the Flagship Ladder

| X2 ($549.95) | X3 ($649.95) | X4 ($699.95) | X5 ($749.95) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | Physical dial + buttons | Premium touch | Premium touch | Premium touch |
| Programs | 3 (Smoothie, Soup, Dessert) | 3 (Smoothie, Soup, Dessert) | 5 (+ Cocktails, Dips) + self-clean | 10 (+ Nut Butter, Non-Dairy Milk, Smoothie Bowl, FrappΓ©, Spice Grinding) |
| Thermometer indicator | β | β | β | β |
| “+15 seconds” extend | β | β | β | β |
| Everything else | Identical: 2.2 HP, 48-oz SELF-DETECT container, timer, 10-yr warranty | |||
The verdict up front: the X2, for most people. Every step up the Ascent X ladder buys you convenience, not performanceβthe motor, container, blades, and 10-year warranty are identical across all models. The question is purely how much automation is worth to you.
Here’s exactly what each step buys:
The $100 jump from X2 to X3 buys the premium touch interface and the thermometer indicatorβand nothing else. Programs stay at three. Of the two, the thermometer is the only one I’d call genuinely usefulβif you make a lot of hot soup, seeing when it’s actually steaming (without stopping the blender) is a nice piece of information to have.
The $50 jump from X3 to X4 adds two more programs (Cocktails and Dips), self-clean as a program, and the “+15 seconds” extend button. This is where the automation story starts.
The $50 jump from X4 to X5 doubles the programs from five to ten, and this is where automation gets real: dedicated walk-away cycles for nut butter, non-dairy milk, and smoothie bowls. If you make almond butter or oat milk weekly, this is the step that changes your routine.
Which leads to my honest read on the middle of the ladder: the X3 and X4 are both in awkward spots. The X3 charges $100 for touch controls and a thermometer while keeping the X2’s three programs. The X4 sits $50 below an X5 that doubles its programs. So if you want automation, the X5 is obviously worth the extra $50; if you don’t, the X2 saves you $100β150. I recommend the middle two to almost nobody.
Choose the Ascent X2 if you want the flagship platform at the lowest price, you like a physical dial, and “press smoothie, walk away” covers your automation needs. This is the right answer for most kitchens.
Choose the Ascent X5 if you make nut butters, plant milks, or smoothie bowls on repeat and want the machine to run them unattended. (The X5 + stainless steel container bundle has dropped as low as $599.95 on promoβless than the X5 aloneβso check my deals page before buying. At its regular $799.95, the X5 alone is the cheaper way in.)
Choose the Ascent X3 if you want the sleek touch panel and the soup thermometer but have zero interest in extra programsβit’s the X2’s simplicity in the X5’s clothes. (A note for my Canadian readers: Vitamix Canada doesn’t carry the X3, so north of the border the ladder goes X2 β X4 β X5.)
Choose the Ascent X4 if you’ve read the everything above and still want it. I’ll allow it. It’s a lovely machine; it’s just rarely the right one.
Vitamix VX1 vs 5200: New Kid vs The Legend

| VX1 ($379.95) | 5200 ($499.95) | |
|---|---|---|
| Motor | 2.2 peak HP | 2.0 peak HP |
| Controls | 10-speed dial | Variable dial + high/low switch |
| Pulse | β | β |
| Self-clean cycle | β | β (manual: soap + high speed) |
| Container | 64-oz classic tall | 64-oz classic tall |
| Warranty | 5 years | 7 years |
The verdict up front: the VX1, unless the 5200’s longer warranty or your own nostalgia carries real weight for you.
This is the matchup that surprises people because the 5200 has two decades of reputation, and the VX1 has been around for about a year. But look at what’s actually on the table:
Same container format, same manual philosophyβbut the VX1 is $120 cheaper, slightly stronger on paper, and adds pulse and a self-clean cycle. The 5200’s advantages are the two extra warranty years and its extraordinary track record: we know 5200s run for 15β20 years because millions have. The VX1 hasn’t been around long enough to prove that (though it’s built by the same company in the same spirit, and I have no reason to doubt it).
Choose the VX1 if you want the best price on a new full-size Vitamix and modern touches like pulse and self-clean. First Vitamix? This is the value pick.
Choose the 5200 if you’re replacing a beloved 5200 and want the identical experience, or the 7-year warranty and twenty-year track record are worth $120 of sleep-well insurance to you. Zero judgmentβI ran mine hard for years.
Propel 750 vs Ascent X2: The Value Play vs The Platform Play

| Propel 750 ($629.95) | Ascent X2 ($549.95) | |
|---|---|---|
| Motor | 2.2 HP | 2.2 HP |
| Programs | 5 + self-clean | 3 |
| SELF-DETECT / attachments | β | β (food processor, cups, bowls) |
| Container | 64-oz low-profile | 48-oz |
| Warranty | 7 years | 10 years |
The verdict up front: the Ascent X2βat today’s prices, this isn’t close. At regular price, the 750 costs $80 more than the X2; only its periodic deep promotions (it has dropped as low as $389.95) turn this into a real contest.
These two machines answer different questions. The 750 asks: “How much blender can I get for my money, right now?” The X2 asks: “Which purchase sets up the next ten years best?”
The 750 gives you the bigger container (great for families) and more programsβbut at regular prices, it costs $80 more than the X2. The X2 gives you three extra warranty years and the SELF-DETECT platform. It’s the only one of the two that can grow into a food processor system or natively support the personal cup adapter.
Choose the Propel 750 if you blend for a household, you’ll never buy an attachment, and you catch one of its periodic promotionsβbelow $400, it’s maximum machine per dollar, and the deal I point budget-savvy families to. (Watch for it on my deals pageβ”while supplies last” means what it says.)
Choose the Ascent X2 if you’re playing the long gameβlongest warranty, expandable platform, cabinet-friendly container. At today’s regular prices, this is the easy answer.
Propel 510 vs VX1: Programs vs Power
The verdict up front: the VX1βit’s $120 cheaper and more powerful. The 510’s case now rests entirely on programs.
The trade is brutally clear: the Propel 510 ($499.95) gives you three walk-away programs and a compact 48-oz container; the VX1 ($379.95) gives you a stronger motor (2.2 vs 2.0 HP), a bigger 64-oz tall container, and a $120 lower price. Same 5-year warranty on both.
Choose the 510 if walk-away programs and the shortest possible machine matter more to you than $120βthough at $499.95, look at the Ascent X2 first: $50 more buys the 10-year warranty and the whole SELF-DETECT platform.
Choose the VX1 if anything else. More power and more capacity for less money is hard to argue withβit’s why the VX1, not the 510, made my best Vitamix picks.
New vs Certified Reconditioned: Full Price vs Smart Price
| New | Certified Reconditioned | |
|---|---|---|
| Machine condition | New | “Like new”βinspected base, brand-new container and accessories |
| Price | Full/promo | $150β400 below equivalent new |
| Selection | Full lineup, all colors | Rotating stockβwhat’s been returned |
| Returns | 60-day risk-free | 60-day risk-free |
| Warranty | 5β10 years by model | Typically 5 years (extendable for a fee) |
The verdict up front: if the model you want is available as a reconditioned unit, it’s almost always the better buy.
Vitamix’s certified reconditioned program isn’t a clearance binβit’s returned and demo units put through a formal 17-step inspection, fitted with a brand-new container, lid, and tamper, and sold with a full warranty (typically 5 years, extendable). I’ve covered the whole process in my reconditioned Vitamix guide, but here’s the comparison that matters:
The reconditioned catch is selection: you buy what’s in stock (currently an Explorian at $319.95, an Alta Pro at $349.95, a reconditioned 5200 at $349.95, an Ascent X2 at $399.95, and an Ascent X4 at $549.95βthe Alta Pro being the standout at $200 off). Stock moves fast and restocks unpredictably.
Choose new if you want a specific current model (reconditioned Ascent X units are only just starting to appear), a specific color, or the 10-year Ascent warranty.
Choose reconditioned if the price-to-machine ratio is what matters. In nearly two decades around these machines, I’ve never had a reader regret a reconditioned unitβonly readers who waited and watched one sell out.
Old Ascent vs Ascent X: Should A3500 (and A2500) Owners Upgrade?

The verdict up front: if your old Ascent works, keep it. The Ascent X is a refinement, not a revolutionβand your machine likely has years of warranty left.
This one’s for the readers who bought an A3500, A2500, or A2300 on my earlier advice and are now wondering what the new X Series means for them. The honest comparison:
What the X Series genuinely improves: a redesigned 48-oz container that’s easier to pour and fits under cabinets, more programs at the top end (the X5’s ten vs the A3500’s five), the thermometer indicator, the tamper-cue display, and small quality-of-life touches throughout.
What it doesn’t change: power (2.2 HP then, 2.2 HP now), blend results (identical), the SELF-DETECT system (your existing Ascent containers and attachments work on Ascent X bases), and the 10-year warranty you’re probably still inside.
Upgrade now if your machine is dying out of warranty, or the 64-oz low-profile container never suited your kitchen and the 48-oz redesign solves a daily annoyance. Trade the old one’s container to a friend and the Ascent X5 will feel like a familiar machine with better manners.
Don’t upgrade if everything works. Put the money toward an attachment insteadβthe food processor attachment changes what your existing Ascent can do far more than a new base would.
Quick-Fire Round
A few matchups that come up less often, answered in one breath each:
5200 vs Propel 750: different philosophiesβpure manual tall-container classic vs programs and a low-profile container. On promo, the 750 is objectively more machine (at regular prices, it costs $130 more than the 5200); the 5200 is for purists. Most people are happier with the 750.
Explorian E310 vs VX1: if you’re comparing these, you’re reading an old reviewβthe E310 is discontinued. The VX1 is its successor in spirit and price, with a stronger motor. (Full discontinued-model map here.)
Full-size vs immersion Vitamix: not actually rivals. The immersion blender purΓ©es soup in the pot and disappears into a drawer; it will never make nut butter or flour. If you’re choosing one blending tool, choose full-size.
Vitamix vs Blendtec (or anything else): that’s a different post entirelyβmy Vitamix vs Blendtec comparison covers the cross-brand battle.
Still Tied?
If a matchup you care about isn’t here, ask me in the commentsβI answer everything, usually within a day, and the best questions become new sections of this post. If you’ve stopped narrowing and started second-guessing, go back to the short list that started it all. And whichever machine wins your personal final: today’s prices for every single one live on my Vitamix deals page.

Hi, I’m Petra, a Registered Holistic Nutritionist and a Raw Food Chef. I have been using a Vitamix for nearly two decades. I personally own several Vitamix blenders (mostly for testing purposes) and use Vitamix exclusively in commercial settings as well.
Whether you’re wondering which Vitamix to buy or what the upcoming Vitamix deals are, you’ll find it on this site.
A full disclosure: I am an affiliate of Vitamix, so if you use my links to purchase a Vitamix, I earn a small commission at no cost to you. Thank you so much for your support.
Hi Petra,
Great information – thanks!
I have several questions about the metal vs non-metal finishes. Do the metal finishes decrease the noise over the non-metal models? If so, do you think it is very noticeable? Also, do you think that the models with metal finishes will have a longer longevity? Finally, am I correct that the only Ascent models with metal finish options are the 3300 (stainless only) and the 3500 (just the ones that say ‘metal’ in the description).
I have a question about the Ascent touch vs manual models. Are the touch screens very ‘sensitive’ to touch – do they respond quickly or do you have to touch them in a certain way or with a firmer pressure to get them to work?
Thanks!
Hi Joie,
1. Yes, the metal ones do decrease noise for sure. I write about it here – with the exact dB you can expect from certain Vitamix models: https://nutritionrefined.com/which-is-the-quietest-vitamix-blender/
2. Longer longevity? Honestly, not necessarily. The plastic vs metal enclosing doesn’t really effect longevity. What affects longevity are the motor and whether it is cool-running, the gear coupling – metal vs plastic, blade quality and whether it gets dull over time, etc.
3. Yes, that is correct. Vitamix used to sell the Pro 750 in metal as well, but that was discontinued.
4. I have the A3500 and the touchscreen is really responsive. As soon as you touch any of the controls, they will respond. You are probably worried about the touchscreen being hypersensitive? If that is the case, nothing actually happens until you press the start button. When you are setting the programs, the speeds, the timer, etc. everything will be showing up on the display, but the blender will not start blending until you actually press the start button that is underneath all the controls. And as far as cleaning goes, the blender will be unplugged, so that is not an issue either. But yes, the touchscreen is very responsive (sensitive) and you don’t need to touch any controls with a firmer pressure.
Let me know if you have any more questions π
. Or let me rephrase – I inherited my Vitamix blender from my husbands grandma who bought it in the 90s. It is over 30 years old and I use it to this day, no issues whatsoever. And yes, it is plastic.
Thanks for answering, Petra, and for the helpful link to your article about the quietest blenders. About the touch sensitivity, I was actually more concerned about non-responsiveness (based on some online reviews that I read), so it is good to know that they are nicely responsive. I think I’ve narrowed my choice down to A3300 or A3500 in a metal finish. Thanks!
I am glad it was helpful, Joie. Hmm, that is interesting. I have never had any issues with non-responsiveness. You do have to touch the entire button – if you touch only half of the button, the touchscreen will not respond. But the buttons are relatively small, so it is pretty hard to not touch the entire button. The good news is that if you do find that the touchscreen is not responsive to your liking (I honestly don’t think it will be an issue), you can always return it. Both the A3300 and the A3500 are excellent blenders!
Hello!
Which Vitamix has the longest longevity? You mention metal vs plastic gear coupling. Which model has which? Perhaps comparing the ascent models to the Pro 750 and 5200.
Your article is wonderful, thank you!
Hi Justin – I couldn’t find where I mention the gear coupling. I know I talk about it in the “Do You Need a High-Speed Blender” article where I say that all Vitamix blenders have a metal gear coupling. I would say that the Ascent blenders have the longest longevity (hence the longest 10-year warranty). You can find a comparison of the A3500, the Pro 750 and the 5200 here π
Let me know if you have any questions.
It appears that the E-320 actually has a 2.2 HP motor rather than the 2.0 in the E-310.
Thank you for catching that, Allen!
In the brief summary following the table of contents you list the best value as the A2300 but in the ending detailed bullets you have the best value as the A2500. Can you please clarify which one?
Thanks!
Hi Amy – ah my mistake. I just now updated the brief summary. It was supposed to be the A2300. My apologies for the confusion.
What are the 3 programed settings offered with the A2500 model? I’m trying to decide between the A2300 and the A2500.
Hi Lynette – the pre-programmed settings are for smoothies, hot soup, and frozen desserts. I think that the A2300 is a slightly better value, but if you like the idea of pre-programmed settings, you can’t go wrong with the A2500.
Hi Petra:
I hope that you’re well. I think that I’m leaning toward getting a 5200, but I’m intrigued by your comment about how you used to highly recommend the 5200 but “However, now that Vitamix came up with a new line of blenders with superior technology and better design, I canβt see a good argument for why the 5200 would be a better value than the A2300.”
Right now both models are the same price.
I’m on the verge of information paralysis on which model to buy, but I know that you have many years experience with Vitamix so I want to lay out my thinking and see what you think.
In reading reviews of the A2300, (and all other Ascent models) most complaints have to do with the size of the container (too big for 1 or 2 people – I’m buying the blender to use for 1 person – me), the blender generating a lot of error codes, the base not recognizing different containers, build quality (materials used, etc.) compared to older models and, occasionally, lack of power! Good heavens.
While the ‘they don’t make them like they used to” complaints cut across ALL of the current Vitamix models, I think that I may fall into the camp of those commenters that wish they had gone with the legacy models and not fallen for the “future-proof” selling point of compatibility with new accessories.
I’m going to use the blender for a daily smoothie. I don’t think that I’ll be making soup in my blender. I already have food processor and the idea of where to store any more additional containers drives me batty.
Believe it or not, I still keep coming back to your comment about you not really being able to recommend the 5200 over the A2300 anymore. So you are responsible for my inability to decide!! Just kidding.
Thank you for considering my predicament and if you think that different model might suit my needs, please let me know. P.S: I’m not interested in Explorian or Venturist.
Hi Jimmy – I am so sorry for not responding earlier! If you want to make smoothies for 1 person, already have a food processor, and don’t really like the idea of having multiple containers, the 5200 is definitely a better option! The reasons I recommend the A2300 over the 5200 are:
1. The option of purchasing other attachments, particularly the food processor attachment. I like the idea of having just 1 base and using it as a blender and a food processor. If you’re happy with your food processor (and wouldn’t be purchasing the Vitamix Food Processor Attachment in the future anyway), this doesn’t really apply to you.
2. More container options – again, it seems that you would rather have 1 container that does multiple things than several containers. I can totally relate to this because I LOVE the 64-oz tall container. It is by far my favorite container because it does it all! I wish Vitamix came up with a 64-oz tall container for Smart System blenders.
3. Future-proofing – Vitamix seems to be developing attachments and containers primarily for Smart System blenders. This is not always the case – for instance, they recently came up with a stainless steel container that works on all full-size Vitamix blenders. However, Vitamix did say that they are building their future around SELF-DETECT technology. So, if they come up with a new attachment in the future, it might not be compatible with Legacy blenders.
To address your point about error codes, I do have the A2300 and have used it for about a year consistently and never got any errors. Honestly. It might be possible, but it never happened to me. I now use the A3500 and no error codes either.
Now, if you are interested in hearing my recommendation, I would say that based on what you have written, the 5200 is hands down a better option for you.
Of course, if you have any questions, please, feel free to reach out again and I will try to respond as best as I can.
Hi Petra:
Thank you so much for your reply to my “which blender to buy” predicament. As usual, you’re very concise and informative with your response.
I appreciate your patience and for responding in such detail.
I’ll be ordering the 5200 very soon and I’ll come to nutritionrefined.com to use your link.
Thank you Jimmy! I really appreciate your support. I am glad I could help π
Hello. I’m currently trying to make a decision (sound familiar?) This blender buy will be for home use.
I’m accustomed to using the tall 64oz container in a commercial environment. Soups – hot and cold, purees, flavored oils (even using 325F oil and pouring into the spinning blender blade over green herbs or dried chiles,) liver pate with frozen whole butter, vinaigrette, dozens of eggs at a time, custards, popcorn spun to cornmeal, etc and I absolutely love the performance I get from the tall container on the two 5200 series models I’m familiar with. My first Vitamix purchase was a reconditioned “Standard” and it took every bit of a beating I could give it. Only one instance the machine needed to cool down to reset in seven years of constant, daily use and I assume it’s still going strong … I’m not with it anymore.
The recommended self-detect A2300 is now on sale for $400 with the 10 year warranty but comes with the “squat” 64oz container. I’m concerned about the self-detect but with the 10 year warranty, commitment to future innovation in self-detect tech and options for additional accessories (spice / pepper grinder 8oz cup, small sauce 20oz,) I’m not that afraid to pull the trigger. The warranty and the under-cabinet form-factor is selling me first.
Here’s my hang-up though. I see you mention that you absolutely love the tall container and I get it.
Will you share why you love the tall container most? Does it perform at a much noticeable improvement vs the (under cabinet friendly) squat container?
I realize this may be a trivial concern but I “know” that tall container vortex so well that It’s hard for me to accept a new design without testing.
Also, is the pulse feature the new way to roll? I like being able to tap into high speed on the 5200 model and find I use it often.
Thank you so much for your testing information!
Hi Marc – a great question. Let’s first address your concern about SELF-DETECT. I have never had any issue with the SELF-DETECT feature. I own the A3500, the A3200, and the A2300 and use one of them at least once a day. If there ever is any issue, I am sure Vitamix will take care of it. Their customer service is amazing. But again, I have never had any issue with it.
Now, the container question is trickier. I still love the 64-oz tall container the most. Here’s my comparison of the two containers if you’re interested: https://nutritionrefined.com/vitamix-containers/#TallLow
In a nutshell, my biggest complaint about the 64-oz low-profile container is that it does not handle single servings of food well. I like to make single-serving smoothies or grind only a little bit of flax seeds at a time, etc. and that just doesn’t work in the low-profile container. The vortex in the low-profile container is fine, but only if you have larger amounts of food. You now have the option to buy smaller containers for Smart System blenders to make single-serving smoothies or grind only a little bit of seeds at a time. BUT for a person who lives alone and doesn’t want to have more than one blender container in their kitchen, I still think that the 64-oz tall container is the most versatile.
Finally, the pulse feature. I used to use the high speed on the 5200 a lot of too. I find that if you turn the speed dial on the Smart System blenders all the way up to 10 (the highest speed), it essentially replaces the high speed function. The speed dial on the 5200 is not the same as the speed dial on the Smart System blenders.
Let me know if you have any other questions π
One final question if you will have me. I see that the A2300 has an opaque lid where I’m used to the black, soft-touch, well-fitting lid. Is the clear lid anything I need to concern myself with? Does it function as well and will it fit just as simply as the black lids I’m familiar with?
The lid is totally fine. The main difference is that the clear lid snaps into place vs the rubber lid locks into place. The clear lid is obviously more rigid and the snapping requires more force. It might be an adjustment in the beginning, but now that I have used the “snapping” mechanism for years, I don’t think about it twice. It’s not worse or better; it’s just different.
I am in the process of deciding which vitamix to buy. I am leaning toward the A3500 because I would like to include the food processor with it. Does the blender you use go with your vitamix. Everything looks like it blends so well in the blender and food processor in your demos. I think my recipes would come out better using the vita mix and food processor. What are your comments on that. Thanks
Hi Miriam – the A3500 is the most expensive Vitamix model, but it is truly the best. I use it all the time in my videos. I try to switch up the blenders in my videos to demonstrate that all models are really good, but they’re all Vitamix. I have the A3500 and the A2500 – both of them are compatible with the food processor attachment – as well as the E310 and the Pro750, which are NOT compatible with the food processor attachment. If you have any particular model in mind and some more information or if you have any other questions, let me know π
Hello,
I notice you don’t include the Vitamix Propel 510 or Propel 750 in your overview. Can you offer any perspective on either of these models vs the Legacy Pro 750?
Thanks,
Wendy
Hi Wendy, I apologize for the very late reply; the post has since been updated and now covers both Propel models. The short version: the Propel 750 is essentially the modern successor to the Legacy Pro 750, with the same 2.2 HP motor, the same 5-program dial with self-clean, the same 64-oz low-profile container, and a 7-year warranty, so between those two I would simply buy whichever is cheaper the day you order. The Propel 510 is the smaller sibling: 2.0 HP, 3 programs, a 48-oz container, and a 5-year warranty. If you want the Pro 750 experience, the Propel 750 is the closer match.