Vitamix Containers: Every Size and Compatibility, Explained (2026)
Vitamix containers used to be a genuinely confusing topic—at one point there were more than 17 of them, and figuring out which fit which machine required a flowchart. Good news: Vitamix has simplified dramatically. The current catalog is down to about a dozen containers, and the compatibility rules now fit in two sentences.
The less good news is that if you learned those rules a few years ago (perhaps from an earlier version of this very article), they’ve changed. Several containers you might be shopping for—the 32-ounce, the original blending cups and bowls—are discontinued (the cups and bowls have a brand-new SELF-DETECT™ successor coming soon), and the new Ascent X machines follow the same strict compatibility split as the Ascent blenders before them.
I’ve been using Vitamix for nearly two decades and own more containers than any reasonable person should. Here’s the current state of the container world: what exists, what fits what, what each size is actually good at, and which (if any) second container is worth your money.
Which Container Fits Your Vitamix? (The Quick Answer)
Every Vitamix compatibility question comes down to which of two worlds your blender lives in:
- SELF-DETECT bases (Ascent X2/X3/X4/X5, plus the older Ascent and Venturist machines) work only with SELF-DETECT™ containers. The base reads a chip in the container and won’t spin anything without one.
- Classic bases (VX1, 5200, Propel 510/750, Explorian, and older Legacy machines) work with the classic, non-chipped containers.
Two containers bridge both worlds: the 48-oz stainless steel container and the 48-oz Aer™ disc container. Everything else stays on its side of the divide.
If you’re still choosing a machine rather than a container, start with my best Vitamix guide—pick the blender first, always. And current container and blender prices live on my Vitamix deals page.
Table of Contents
The Two Container Systems
SELF-DETECT Containers
SELF-DETECT™ is Vitamix’s wireless container-recognition technology. The base identifies which container you’ve attached and automatically adjusts program settings, maximum blend times, and up to 140 other parameters to match. It’s also a safety system: nudge the container off-center and the machine shuts off.
This technology is what powers the whole Ascent attachment ecosystem, including the 12-cup food processor attachment—the base needs to know it’s driving a food processor bowl, not a blending container.
The trade-off is exclusivity. A SELF-DETECT base won’t run a container without the chip, period. If you upgrade from a 5200 to an Ascent X4, your beloved old containers stay behind.
SELF-DETECT bases: Ascent X2, X3, X4, X5 (2024–present), plus the discontinued Ascent A-series and Venturist machines. If you’re not sure which series you own, my Vitamix models guide sorts out the whole family tree.
Classic Containers
Classic containers have no chip—just a splined drive socket that matches the drive on every non-SELF-DETECT Vitamix made in the last several decades. This is the remarkable part of Vitamix’s design: a brand-new VX1 accepts the same container family as machines from the 1990s.
Classic bases: VX1, 5200, Propel 510 and 750, Explorian (E310/E320), and the older Legacy machines (5300, 6500, 7500, Pro 750, and so on).
One nuance within the classic world: the 64-oz low-profile container has a wider 4-inch blade that needs a 2.2 HP motor to drive properly. On 2.0 HP bases (5200, Propel 510, E310), stick with 3-inch-blade containers—the tall 64-oz, the 48-oz, or the personal cups.
The Two Containers That Work on Everything
The 48-oz stainless steel container and the 48-oz Aer™ disc container carry SELF-DETECT chips and fit classic drive systems, so they run on any full-size Vitamix. If you own machines from both worlds (guilty), these are the only containers you can carry between them.
Every Vitamix Container in 2026
Prices below are vitamix.com list prices as of August 2026—any live promotions are on my Vitamix deals page.
| Container | Capacity | Blade | Min. batch (liquid / thick) | Included with |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64-oz Low-Profile SELF-DETECT | 64 oz / 2.0 L | 4-inch | 16 oz / 28 oz | Sold separately (shipped with the original Ascent A-series) |
| 48-oz SELF-DETECT (wet) | 48 oz / 1.4 L | 3-inch | 12 oz / 24 oz | Every Ascent X (X2–X5) |
| 48-oz Dry Grains SELF-DETECT | 48 oz / 1.4 L | Blunted dry blade | — | Sold separately |
| 20-oz Blending Cup & 8-oz Bowl | 20 oz / 0.6 L · 8 oz / 0.24 L | Kit blade base | Single servings by design | Coming soon, sold separately |
| 12-Cup Food Processor | 12 cups / 2.8 L | Multi-use blade + discs | — | Sold separately (also in SmartPrep Kitchen Systems) |
| 48-oz Stainless Steel | 48 oz / 1.4 L | 3-inch | 12 oz / 24 oz | Sold separately |
| 48-oz Aer Disc | 48 oz / 1.4 L | Aerating disc (no blades) | Single-drink amounts are fine | Sold separately |
| Classic 64-oz (Tall) | 64 oz / 2.0 L | 3-inch | 8 oz / 20 oz | VX1 and 5200 |
| Low-Profile 64-oz | 64 oz / 2.0 L | 4-inch | 16 oz / 28 oz | Propel 750 |
| 48-oz | 48 oz / 1.4 L | 3-inch | 12 oz / 24 oz | Propel 510 |
| Personal Cup Adapter (20-oz cups) | 20 oz / 0.6 L | Adapter blade | Single servings by design | Sold separately (also bundled with some VX1 and 5200 packages) |
“Thick” means low-liquid blends—nut butters, frozen desserts, doughs. Click a container name to jump to its full breakdown.
64-oz Low-Profile Container with SELF-DETECT
The family-size option for Ascent and Ascent X owners. Same short, wide shape as the classic low-profile: fits under cabinets, blends big batches beautifully, struggles a little with very small ones.
- 64-oz low-profile container with SELF-DETECT · $179.95 · 4-inch blade · minimum batch roughly 16 oz liquid, 28 oz thick · tamper included · SELF-DETECT bases
48-oz Container with SELF-DETECT (Wet & Dry)
The standard container of the Ascent X era—every Ascent X machine ships with one. It fits under upper cabinets on the base, handles everything from a single smoothie to soup for four, and comes with a tamper.
- 48-oz container with SELF-DETECT · $169.95 · 3-inch blade · minimum batch roughly 12 oz liquid, 24 oz thick · SELF-DETECT bases (runs on classic bases as a standard container—see the chart notes)
- 48-oz dry grains container with SELF-DETECT · $169.95 · the same jar with a blunted “dry” blade that pushes flour and grains up instead of pulling them down (more on whether you need one below)
20-oz Blending Cups & 8-oz Bowls with SELF-DETECT
The newest entry in the catalog—announced for 2026 and coming soon, not yet for sale—and it closes the SELF-DETECT world’s longest-standing gap: no personal-size containers. The starter kit pairs a blade base and a SELF-DETECT™ adapter with a 20-oz cup and an 8-oz bowl—blend, swap the blade for the drinking or storage lid, and take the same vessel out the door. The base reads the adapter and automatically shortens its programs to cup-size batches.
The kit is the required entry point: bare cups and bowls ship without the blade base and adapter, so extras only make sense once you own it. The 8-oz bowl is the one I reach for with dressings, sauces, and baby food; the 20-oz cup handles a single smoothie. Everything is BPA-free Tritan, and the cups, bowls, lids, and blade base are all dishwasher-safe.
- Blending Cup and Bowl Starter Kit with SELF-DETECT · coming soon, announced at $149.95 · blade base + adapter + 20-oz cup + 8-oz bowl + drinking and storage lids · SELF-DETECT bases only (Ascent X, Ascent, Venturist)
- Extra 20-oz blending cup · coming soon, announced at $39.95 · cup and drinking lid only—requires the kit’s blade base and adapter
12-Cup Food Processor Attachment with SELF-DETECT
Technically a container—the base drives it exactly the way it drives a blending jar—and easily the most ambitious thing in the catalog. The attachment turns any SELF-DETECT machine into a full-size food processor: a 12-cup Tritan work bowl, a multi-use blade for chopping and dough, and two reversible discs for slicing and shredding, with a storage case to keep it all together.
It runs on SELF-DETECT bases only (Ascent X, Ascent, Venturist)—classic machines have no food processor option. I’ve put it through months of real cooking in my full food processor review, including what it does better than a dedicated processor and where it falls short.
- 12-cup food processor attachment · $279.95 · multi-use blade + 2 reversible slice/shred discs + disc storage case · SELF-DETECT bases only
- Food processor attachment bundle · $349.95 · adds the julienne, veggie-stick, and fine-shred/ultra-thin-slice discs plus a stack-and-store extender
48-oz Stainless Steel Container
The premium option, and one of the two universal containers. Brushed 304 stainless steel—the material Vitamix used before 1991—with real advantages beyond looks:
- Thermally insulating (hot soups stay hot, frozen desserts stay frozen)
- Unbreakable and scratch-proof, no matter how much frozen fruit you throw at it
- Non-porous, so it never clouds, stains, or holds odors
The trade-offs: you can’t see your blend through steel, and it’s the most expensive container Vitamix makes.
- 48-oz stainless steel container · $249.95 · 3-inch blade · tamper included · all full-size Vitamix bases, both worlds
48-oz Aer™ Disc Container
The specialist. Instead of blades, the Aer uses a perforated disc that whips, foams, emulsifies, and muddles rather than pulverizes. Bars use it for cocktails; Starbucks uses it for cold foam; I use it for lemonade (it extracts citrus without bitter pith) and the occasional whipped cream. A wonderful third container, an odd first one.
- 48-oz Aer disc container · $169.95 · disc, not blade · no tamper (you won’t need one) · all full-size Vitamix bases, both worlds
Classic 64-oz Container (Tall)
My favorite Vitamix container, full stop, and the one Vitamix has sold since 1992. The tall, narrow shape creates a perfectly controlled vortex that folds ingredients back into the blade—which is why it can blend a single 8-oz serving and a full 64-oz batch with equal grace. It ships with the VX1 and the 5200.
The one honest drawback: at 13.4 inches (20.5 on the base), it won’t fit under most upper cabinets with the container mounted. It fits under mine, and I store the machine in a cupboard anyway—but measure before you commit.
- Classic 64-oz container · $179.95 · 3-inch blade · minimum batch roughly 8 oz liquid, 20 oz thick · tamper compatibility: classic tamper · classic bases, including 2.0 HP machines
Low-Profile 64-oz Container
The classic-world version of the wide 64: full capacity, cabinet-friendly 10.1-inch height (17.25 on the base), 4-inch blade. Ships with the Propel 750; also the right spare for owners of the older 7500, Pro 750, 5300, 6500, and E320.
- Low-profile 64-oz container · $179.95 · 4-inch blade · minimum batch roughly 16 oz liquid, 28 oz thick · 2.2 HP classic bases only (VX1, Propel 750, E320, and 2.2 HP Legacy machines)
48-oz Container
The classic mid-size, and the container that ships with the Propel 510. Nearly identical height to the low-profile 64 but narrower, so it blends smaller batches more willingly. For classic-base owners who find the 64s too big, this is the workhorse.
- 48-oz container · $159.95 · 3-inch blade · minimum batch roughly 12 oz liquid, 24 oz thick · classic bases, including 2.0 HP machines
Personal Cup Adapter (+ 20-oz Travel Cups)
The classic world’s answer to single servings: a blade base that screws onto 20-oz to-go cups, plus an adapter that drives it. Blend, flip, swap the blade for a lid, and leave. It comes bundled with the VX1 in the VX1 + Personal Cup Adapter package, and extra 20-oz travel cups run $29.95.
Know its limits: no tamper and no vented lid, so it’s for smoothies, dressings, and sauces—not nut butter or hot soup. And frozen chunks need to be small enough to reach the blade.
- Personal Cup Adapter · $149.95 · includes two 20-oz cups with lids · classic bases only—not compatible with any Ascent or Ascent X machine
The Compatibility Chart
| Container | Ascent X · Ascent · Venturist | VX1 · Propel 750 · E320 (2.2 HP classic) | 5200 · Propel 510 · E310 (2.0 HP classic) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48-oz w/ SELF-DETECT | ✓ | ✓* | ✓* |
| 48-oz dry grains w/ SELF-DETECT | ✓ | ✓* | ✓* |
| 64-oz low-profile w/ SELF-DETECT | ✓ | ✓* | – |
| Classic 64-oz (tall) | – | ✓ | ✓ |
| Low-profile 64-oz | – | ✓ | – |
| 48-oz | – | ✓ | ✓ |
| 48-oz stainless steel | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 48-oz Aer disc | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Personal Cup Adapter | – | ✓ | ✓ |
| 12-cup food processor | ✓ | – | – |
| Blending cup & bowl kit (coming soon) | ✓ | – | – |
*SELF-DETECT wet and dry containers physically run on classic bases as standard containers (the smart features simply stay dormant), though Vitamix now lists them only for SELF-DETECT machines. If you’re buying new for a classic base, buy the classic version and save the difference.
The reverse is never true: no classic container will run on an Ascent or Ascent X base. The machine won’t detect a container and won’t start.
Which Container Size Should You Buy?
First, the answer nobody selling containers will give you: the container that came with your machine handles all the essential jobs, and most people never need a second one. A second container earns its place when the shape of your blending doesn’t match the shape of your jar. Three questions sort it out.
How small are your usual batches? Container minimums matter more than maximums. Wide jars need enough volume to reach the blade: the low-profile 64 wants at least ~16 oz of liquid ingredients, while the tall 64 and the 48s happily blend a single serving. If you own a low-profile 64 and mostly blend for one, a 48-oz container or the upcoming blending cup and bowl kit (SELF-DETECT world), or the Personal Cup Adapter (classic world), will change your daily experience more than any other purchase.
How big is your biggest regular batch? Soup for six, batch smoothies, or entertaining means a 64. A household of one or two rarely uses capacity a 48 can’t cover—and leftovers freeze.
How tall are your cabinets? The tall 64 is the best all-rounder Vitamix makes, but only if it has somewhere to live. Measure the gap under your uppers: you need about 20.5 inches to park a tall-container setup assembled, versus about 17.5 for the 48s and low-profile 64.
Tall 64 vs. Low-Profile 64
The eternal classic-world question. The tall container blends smaller batches, controls its vortex better, and needs less tamper intervention; the low-profile fits under cabinets and spreads big batches across a wider blade. I reach for the tall one nearly every time—but I also don’t store my blender on the counter. If yours lives under the uppers, the decision is made for you.
Wet vs. Dry Container
The dry-grains container pushes ingredients up and away from the blade like a grain mill, which gives slightly fluffier flours and better-behaved bread dough. Do you need it? Probably not. I’ve made flour, breadcrumbs, and flaxseed meal in wet containers for years without drama.
The honest reason to buy one isn’t performance—it’s cosmetics. Grinding grains, coffee, and spices eventually etches a cloudy haze into any Tritan container, and it’s irreversible. Heavy grinders should designate a sacrificial jar; everyone else can skip it.
Tritan vs. the Stainless Steel Container
Standard containers are BPA-free Eastman Tritan copolyester—as tough as polycarbonate, without the BPA. The stainless container exists for people who want zero plastic touching hot food, zero scratching, and a container that will outlive the machine. Nothing blends better in steel; it’s a materials preference, and a legitimate one.
And no—Vitamix doesn’t make a glass container. No high-speed blender maker does; at these speeds, shattering is a real risk. If glass is non-negotiable, a Vitamix isn’t your machine.
Discontinued Containers (And What to Do If You Own One)
Vitamix’s container purge was almost as sweeping as its blender-lineup reorganization. Gone from the new-product catalog:
- 32-oz container (wet and dry)—the classic small-batch jar. Its role passed to the 48-oz, whose minimums are only slightly larger.
- 20-oz blending cup and 8-oz blending bowl SELF-DETECT kits—the original Ascent-era personal containers, retired for years without replacement. That gap is finally closing: the new Blending Cup and Bowl Starter Kit (announced, coming soon) brings the format back for every SELF-DETECT machine (covered above). The old cups keep working on the bases they were made for, but they’re a different system from the new kit.
- 40-oz and 20-oz Space Saving containers—orphaned when the S-series personal blenders died in 2019.
If you own any of these: keep using them. They work exactly as they always did on the bases they were made for, spare parts like lids remain available, and separately purchased containers carry a 3-year warranty from purchase. Discontinued means “no longer sold,” not “no longer supported.” It’s one more reason not to sell an old Ascent machine just because you upgraded—those blending cups won’t work on anything newer.
Tampers
Every wet container above except the Aer and the personal cups and bowls is tamper-compatible, and most include one. Vitamix now makes four tampers (Classic, Low-Profile, S2 Low-Profile, and Mini), and they are not interchangeable—the right one is sized so it can’t reach the blades of its own container. Which tamper fits which container, current prices, and what to do if you’ve lost yours are all in my Vitamix tamper guide.
Vitamix Container FAQ
Within their world, mostly; across worlds, no. Classic containers interchange across classic bases (VX1, 5200, Propel, Explorian, Legacy), subject to the 4-inch-blade/2.2 HP rule. SELF-DETECT containers interchange across Ascent, Ascent X, and Venturist bases. No classic container works on any SELF-DETECT base.
Yes. All SELF-DETECT containers—including the discontinued blending cups and bowls—work across the original Ascent, Venturist, and Ascent X machines. If you upgraded from an A2500 to an X4, every container you own comes with you.
Physically, the SELF-DETECT wet and dry containers run on classic bases as ordinary containers—the smart features just stay dormant. But there’s no reason to pay for a chip you can’t use: buy the classic equivalent instead.
Ascent X2 through X5: the 48-oz SELF-DETECT container. Propel 750: the low-profile 64-oz. Propel 510: the 48-oz. VX1 and 5200: the classic 64-oz tall. Full model details are in my Vitamix models guide.
Nothing directly—it’s discontinued. The 48-oz container is the closest current option for small batches on classic and SELF-DETECT bases alike, and its minimum batch sizes are only slightly larger. Existing 32-oz containers remain fully supported.
The upcoming Blending Cup and Bowl Starter Kit with SELF-DETECT is built for exactly this—a 20-oz cup and an 8-oz bowl that run on any Ascent X—but it has not gone on sale quite yet. Until it ships, use the 48-oz container: its minimums (roughly 12 oz of liquid) genuinely cover a one-person smoothie. The Personal Cup Adapter remains incompatible with Ascent X.
The Bottom Line
Pick the machine first; the container ecosystem follows from that choice automatically. If you’re adding a second container, the winners are boringly consistent: small-batch owners of a 64 should add a 48-oz—or, once it ships, the blending cup and bowl kit—(or the Personal Cup Adapter on classic machines), big-batch owners of a 48 should add the 64 their motor supports, and the stainless steel container is the upgrade for people who never want to think about plastic or scratches again.
Container prices rarely drop—but machines bundle with extra containers during promotions, which is often the cheapest way in. Current offers are always on my Vitamix deals page.
Hi, I’m Petra, a Registered Holistic Nutritionist and a Raw Food Chef. I have been using Vitamix for nearly two decades. I own several Vitamix blenders (mostly for testing purposes) and use Vitamix exclusively in commercial settings as well.
Whether you’re wondering which Vitamix to buy or what the upcoming Vitamix deals are, you’ll find it on this site.
A full disclosure: I am an affiliate of Vitamix, so if you use my links to purchase a Vitamix, I earn a small commission at no cost to you. Thank you so much for your support.
You are providing a ton of good information here, Petra, and I thank you for that. However, I can’t find any of the labels on my container that you refer to (e.g., Classic, etc.) but I have only the model number and other numbers.
Hi Judy – there is no actual “label” on the container (other than SELF-DETECT, if applicable). Ascent, Classic, and Space Saving is a terminology Vitamix uses to distinguish their blender series and containers. Are you trying to determine which container you have? I can definitely help with that.
Thank you, Petra. I did find the model number. That might be all I need. But I’m shocked to find that this simple little plastic container is $133 on Amazon! And a new 48oz VItamix is about $500!?!??
Hmm, which 48-oz container are you referring to? None of the 48-oz containers costs more than $200 if I am not mistaken (the stainless steel container is the most expensive at $199 when purchased directly from Vitamix website). Vitamix is a bit pricier because it’s a high-speed blender (standard blenders do run cheaper for sure). Another thing to consider is that more than 70% of Vitamix parts are made in the US (which is quite unusual).
Hi Petra, The model number is VMO197. I haven’t yet checked the Vitamix website, but I will. Thank you for wanting to provide help. – Judy
You’re very welcome, Judy. Don’t ever hesitate to reach out if you have any questions.
Hello, My Vitamix is model VM0103, The Front of the machine says 5200C. My blades have gotten stuck? They no longer rotate. Im trying to replace the blades but the ones I ordered from Amazon so not work since the assembly is too short when I attach it to the container. Im trying to find replacement blades but failing that maybe a new container? This is all so complicated.
Id really appreciate any advice you can offer. Im rather lost without my vitamix!
Thanks
Susan
Hi Susan, Vitamix does not recommend changing the blades. You could contact the customer support – service@vitamix.com or 800 848 2649. However, I am suspecting that they will recommend purchasing a new container that is compatible with your machine unless the container is still under warranty. If the blender/container is still under warranty, definitely contact the customer support as they will send you a new container free of charge. Let me know if you need any help.
Hi Petra, Thanks for this beautiful article…actually, i’m not sure for my choice…. between a Ascent 2300 with the cups in extra or a Explorian 310 with a 2L low-profile container + 0,9L container. My aim is to be able to prepare any kind of quantities : dips, soups for 2 or 3 , smoothies, hoummous, vegetal milks, mixing nuts. What could be your advices ? thanks ! Olivier
Hi Olivier – if you want more versatility, I would go with the Ascent. Not only because a larger selection of containers, but also because you have the option to add a food processor attachment in the future. I use the attachment all the time. I do like the 48-oz container (the one that comes with the E310) a lot though. So, if I was building my setup, I would go with the A2300 and buy an extra 48-oz SELF-DETECT container. The blending cups are great, but you can make a single portion of a smoothie in the 48-oz container as well (plus much more). I use the 48-oz container for hummus, nut butters, and smoothies a lot.
I would go with the E310 if you:
– Only want to make small to medium batches of food and don’t need large quantities of food (e.g. soup for 4-6 people).
– Already know you won’t be buying the food processor attachment in the future.
– Are not interested in the blending cups and blending bowls (which, honestly, are not necessary – unless you have children. Then the bowls are super helpful).
Let me know if you have any other questions 🙂
Thanks a lot Petra for your detailed answer, you have a lot of experience in Vitamix and your website is so useful for beginners ! For the moment unfortunately the 48-oz container is still not available in Europe, we have only blending cup (not oi useful as you mentioned) and small blending bowls (maybe very useful fro small parts of dips, or for small quantities of flaxseed…). For the moment we still don’t have the option for food processor attachment.
So choice is more difficult in France… (by the way i’m cooking generally for 3 people…).
let me know if you have more remarks to guide me…
Got it! My apologies – I didn’t realize you were in France. Well, then my answer will depend on a few things, but let me first ask you – do you have the option to purchase a Vitamix blender with the tall (64-oz container), such as the 5200? If you don’t really have the option to add the food processor attachment or purchase most other containers, the iconic 5200 might make the most sense for you. You can easily make small batches food as well as large batches in the narrow (tall) 64-oz container. For that reason, the tall 64-oz container is by far my favorite! The only downside is that the setup (the blender base + the container) does not fit under most kitchen cabinets. (You can read more about the 5200 here).
If you’re deciding only between the E310 and the A2300, then I would ask these questions:
1. Is there a possibility that you will eventually be cooking for more than 3 people? If not, the E310 with the 48-oz container will suffice. If yes, the problem is that you cannot get a larger container for the E310. But then, of course, you can blend in batches.
2. Are you planning on making small batches of food (e.g. single servings of smoothies)? If so, the E310 is a better choice. You could get the blending cup for the A2300, but it’s not practical for dips and other thick blends. Personally, I like leftovers, so I make large batches of hummus and nut butters even if I am cooking just for myself and freeze the leftovers. But if you want to make just a small amount, the large 64-oz container will be frustrating.
3. Is there anything about the E310/A2300 blender base that you really like? I always recommend choosing a blender first (not the container). For instance, you might really like the simplicity of the E310. Or perhaps you like the Smart System technology that comes with the A2300. Consider the features of the blender as well.
As always, let me know if you have any other questions.
Hi Petra, well it seems the we can only find Ascent Series or E310 in France, no 5200… but we can find the Legacy containers. It seems that it’s possible to use the the narrow (tall) 64 – oz on a E310 isn’t it ? But in this case i have to buy it as a extra container.
https://www.cuisinedubienetre.fr/produit/bol-2l-haut-vitamix/
It seems that you are not so fan of the small blending bowls…
Thanks for all your amazing remarks, it’s really helpful.
Since both the 5200 and the E310 have a 2-HP motor and a 3-inch blade container, you should be able to use them interchangeably but I will test it today and let you know. I wouldn’t get the secondary container quite yet. Perhaps you’ll find out that you don’t even need it. As far as the bowls go, it’s not that I am not a fan. It’s just that I don’t typically make very small amounts of food. I can make small enough batches of food in the tall 64-oz container, which is more practical – it comes with a tamper (the bowls don’t, obviously) and you can check your blend just by taking the lid off (the bottom of the bowls have to unscrewed and it can be messy, depending on what you’re blending, if you want to screw the bottom back on).
Hi Petra, what would be the best recipient for this kind of recipe: https://nutritionrefined.com/keto-porridge/
Do you think the cup is a good one ? Is it also possible to do it in the 2L recipient of a Ascent ?
I mean with the proportion of your recipe…
Thanks in advance and thanks for your inspiring website !
Olivier
Hi Olivier – you could totally use the 64-oz (2-L) container for this recipe. Dry ingredients are a bit different than liquid. The blade pushes them up (instead of pulling them down) and so they sort of “fly” around in the container until they are finely chopped or ground. I am using the Ascent with the 64-oz container in that recipe video. I recommend watching it, so you see it in action 🙂
Hi Petra, I found maybe a solution to buy in Europe a Pro 750, do you think it could be a good choice for me…? As i’m looking a way to get a 2L and 1,4L container (In Europe 1,4L self-detect in not available for the moment).
Hi Olivier – the Pro 750 is an excellent blender, particularly if you like the idea of having preset programs. I write about that blender in my Best Vitamix Blenders review (if you’re interested). And yes, that model would solve your issue with the containers as you could get both the 2 L and the 1.4 L. The only downside is that the Pro 750 is one of the pricier Vitamix blenders.
I agree with you Petra I don’t need the programs as it’s only a kind of timer… but for the moment i found only this Legacy model Pro 750 in Europe (with the E310 wich seems less versatile ?) . Regards from Paris.
Yea, totally. If you have the budget, the Pro 750 is definitely better than the E310. The E310 is an entry-level model, meaning it has a slightly less powerful motor (2 HP vs 2.2 HP), fewer features (no presets), and the container has a smaller blade (3″ vs 4″). The E310 is also louder than the Pro 750. However, I do use the E310 from time to time (for demonstration purposes) and never had any issues with it. It blends everything just as well as the Pro 750. If I gave you two smoothies – one made in the E310 and the other made in the Pro 750 – you wouldn’t know the difference. It might just take a bit longer to make it in the E310.
Thanks again for your very useful remarks and comments Petra !
Thanks again for the detailed precisions Petra and i have the feeling that i will buy your ebook for dinner recipes, it looks gorgeous !
Hi Petra reading again your article concerning containers….with a 64 oz (with a Pro 750) maybe a 32 oz would be more versatile than a 48 oz as a second container…? Thanks !
Hi Olivier – if I remember correctly, you mentioned that you typically cook for up to 3 people. The 32-oz container is small. It’s great for single servings of smoothies, small amounts of ice cream, thick blends, grinding dry ingredients, etc. However, if you’re trying to make a smoothie for two, it gets a little tight (because a lot of the ingredients are quite bulky before you blend them). We are a family of 4, so I never use the 32-oz container. I do use the 48-oz container though. So, it really depends on the quantity of food you are planning on preparing.
Thanks Petra for your energy, and you have good memories, as we are 3 at home or sometimes only two. I was thinking about a 32 oz mainly for thick blends, grinding dry ingredients, small amount of different dips. For our smoothies, the 48 oz will be fine i think. Anyway i will go first with buying the Pro 750 coming with the 64 oz and i will see later for a second container…(easy to find here in France except the Ascent container….).
Totally! Get the Pro 750 with the 64-oz container first and see if you end up needing an additional container 🙂
but as you told in your article difference between 48 oz and 32 oz for short amount of preparation is not so important, i mean for thick blends, grinding dry ingredients, small amount of different dips. is it correct ?
Yes, you won’t notice much difference with the small quantities. And it is true that you can always use the 64-oz container for larger amounts of smoothies and other blends. So, you will most likely get most out of the 32-oz container (for small batches of food) paired with the 64-oz low-profile container (for large batches of food).
Thanks Petra! i saw this morning in Paris a second hand Vitamix 300 ( bought new in 2017 by the seller) does it make sense also…? is it same as the 750 without the presets…?
Yes, the Pro 300 is labeled as the 7500 here in North America. If you’re comparing it to the Pro 750, yes, it is the same as the Pro 750 minus the preset programs.
I am about to purchase a pro 750 which comes with a 64oz low profile container if I’m remembering correctly. Would a tall 64oz container fit on the pro 750 if I got it as a second container? We are a family of 7 so big batches but I also love to make thick single serving smoothies
Hi Sandy – yes, you’re right. The Pro 750 does come with a 64-oz low-profile container. The 64-oz tall container will fit on the Pro 750 if you’d like to purchase is as a secondary container.
Hello there! I am looking to purchase our first Vitamix blender. After years of trying other blenders, we end up not using them given they just do not seem powerful enough to blend even a smoothie sometimes. 3 of us, picky 11 year son. So we give in sometimes in order to get him to try new things. No judgement! But tried to blend a small amount of spaghettis sauce to make it more smooth, and add some ketchup. Too small an amount for most containers. Is this something for which the bowl with Ascent would work well? I like the idea of preset programs, trying to decide if we really need it. Any advice is greatly appreciated. In comparison to most other blenders with 3 inch blades, do the Vitamix blades perform better? Or with the 2.2hp motor? We would use the 20 ounce person cup frequently for individual smoothies, as long as it has plenty of power to make a thick smoothie. Thank you!
Hi Christine – great questions.
For small amounts of food, the best containers are:
1. The 64-oz (tall) container – even though it has a large capacity, it is quite narrow, so it handles small amounts of food really well.
2. The 32-oz container – it is just as narrow as the 64-oz (tall) container, so great for small quantities of food as well.
3. The 20-oz blending cup and the 8-oz blending bowl.
The one problem with the 20-oz blending cup and the 8-oz bowl is that they don’t come with a tamper. So, if the blend is very thick, you need to stop the blender, move the content around and blend again. It is not a problem for smoothies, sauces, baby food, etc., but if you wanted to make a frozen dessert in the blending cup, for instance, it might be an issue. I prefer containers with a tamper for very thick blends.
The advantage of the Ascent blenders is the variety of containers you can get. Also, Vitamix seems to be focusing on SELF-DETECT technology, and so new containers are always compatible with Smart System blenders. For example, the new food processor attachment is compatible with Smart System models whereas it is not compatible with Legacy models.
Preset programs are nice, but not necessary. I write more about this here: https://nutritionrefined.com/vitamix-comparison/ (under manual settings vs preset programs).
Honestly, there is not really any difference in power when you compare the 2.0 HP Vitamix blenders with the 2.2 HP Vitamix blenders. When you calculate the actual wattage and ignore the listed horsepower rating (which is typically peak horsepower), you realize that you are getting nearly the same blending power, around 1,500 watts.
A couple more resources that might help in deciding which Vitamix blender is the best for you:
The best Vitamix blenders: https://nutritionrefined.com/best-vitamix-blender/
Vitamix comparison: https://nutritionrefined.com/vitamix-comparison/
Vitamix models: https://nutritionrefined.com/vitamix-models/
And of course, don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any more questions.
Some follow-up:
1. We found the Vitamix Ascent 2300 Super Bundle at Costo with a $100 manufacturers coupon, so $499.99.
2. 64 ounce low profile container, 48 ounce dry goods, tamper with holder, two 20 ounce cups, recipe book.
3. Have used it only about 6 times so far, but are VERY happy! We will primarily use it for smoothies. It works SO well!
4. Not knowing the real difference when used between the higher watt other blenders and 2.2HP on paper, I had wondered if much difference in power, Way more powerful and 64 ounce sturdy 4″ blade is great.
5. Cup works perfect for individual smoothie, works best if you reverse the order you layer smoothie ingredients compared to the standard containers given you place the cup upside-down to blend.
6. LOUD, but blenders are a bit lower level loud anyway. Worth it
7. I can also use the cup to blend smaller amounts, like some spaghetti sauce for my son for no chunks, and add a little ketchup to entice him to try to eat it.
8. Manual instead of touch screen controls, and no programs. Blend smoothies and most things for such a short time it won’t make that much difference for us. We are going to try to make some soup, but even then we will tend to be in the kitchen doing other things and use timer on Alexa if a change in speed is needed. The deal was so good it did not seem worth the extra money for the other Ascent touch screen models.
9. So easy to clean, when it gets to higher speed it gets up to clean the upper parts of container and lid without leaking fluid at all.
10. Blends the fruit better, so barely any things like strawberry seeds compared to prior blenders.
11. Love this smoothie: coconut water, vanilla soy milk, sugar-free Greek yogurt, frozen pineapple, banana, flax seed, fiber powder, unsweetened coconut bits. I plan to freeze the peeled ripe bananas and freeze different sizes to thicken smoothie and maybe reduce some of liquids that contain more sugars.
Such a wonderful review. Thank you so much, Christine! I am sure other people will find this really helpful. I LOVE my Vitamix, so I am not at all surprised you are very happy with it 🙂
I’m also totally Happy with my Vitamix Pro 750, with one low profile 64 and a 32 as the second one. Thanks Petra for your wonderful help and your experience !
Thank you so much Olivier! I am so glad you find the information I share helpful.
Hi Petra!
Recently divorced and he got my beloved Vitamix 5200. I’m undecided between the Pro750 and the A2300.
It basically boils down to:
1.) My loathing for tech (and I’ve read a number of reviews stating trouble with the ascent line smart tech connecting/reading the containers. That being said its all warrantied anyways right?
2.) New lid design stinks between the hard plastic and the added gasket (gets icky and will degrade over time – moreso if removing it for cleaning regularly)
3.) BUT…. and this is a huge one for me! The A2300 can utilize that invaluable food processor (I currently have a little oskar that was my mom’s and her mom’s but just doesn’t work as good as a vitamix….. plus I live in a VERY tiny space so one or 5 less appliances and tools….invaluable)
4.) Pro 750 is tried and true. It’s really my base of choice being that it doesn’t have the tech and it still has the 2.2hp motor, and from what I understand is all metal and rubber fittings inside. Does the A2300 have some plastic parts? I haven’t been able to sort that out.
I mostly currently use it for: grinding spices, flours, nuts, berries, meats ….. smoothies, juices, dough, soups, dips, ice cream/sorbet, marinades/sauces/dressings, pet food. But man what i could do with that food processor!
So pro 750 or a2300? Please, any experience or thoughts you have would be so greatly appreciated!
Hi Charlotte,
Great questions!
1. I totally understand your concern. Let me start by saying that I now own four different Ascent blenders (for testing purposes) and never had any connectivity issues with them whatsoever. I asked Vitamix and they said that it used to be an issue with the first Ascent blenders they released but it is no longer the case. IF you do experience any connectivity issues, the Ascent blenders come with a 10-year warranty and yes, this would 100% be covered. Vitamix also offers a 30-day money back guarantee. If you are not completely satisfied and don’t find Vitamix to meet your expectations, you can return it within 30 days for a full refund – Vitamix will even pay for return shipping.
2. What can I say … personally, I like the rubber lid more. However, I do have to say that the Ascent (clear plastic) lid has a better seal. The plastic lid also “snaps” in place, so you can clearly hear when the lid is put on the container properly. Again, if you did experience any degrading (I haven’t, at least not yet), you can call Vitamix and they would take care of it.
3. 100%. The food processor attachment was huge for me too. I actually sold my old food processor (Breville Sous Chef) because the Vitamix blender-food processor combo took so much less space. If you are thinking about getting the Vitamix food processor attachment in the future, the A2300 is a no brainer.
4. I am sorry, I am not sure I understand what you mean by “fittings”?
Ok, so which one? If I were you, I would go with the A2300. Again, I have the A2300 model at home and never had any issues with it.
The one thing I feel that I should warn you about is that if you are used to the 64-oz tall container (from the 5200), the 64-oz low-profile container might take some time getting used to. The bottom of the container is wider, so it requires a larger quantity of food to blend efficiently.
Please, fee free to reach out if you have any more questions. I know that buying a Vitamix is an investment, so I would love to help as best as I can. The good news is that even if you order a blender and are not happy with it, you can return it or exchange it within 30 days for free, no questions asked.
Hi Petra,
Thank you so much for the detailed rundown! Yours was the only one that compared the width of the containers and the minimum amount needed (for liquids and thick ingredients, too!).
I have the 5200 with the tall 64oz container, and love it, but am looking into either the 48oz or 32oz since my sink space is pretty tight and washing the 64oz can be a bit tricky.
I primarily make soups and smoothies for 1-2 people. Would the 48oz be a better choice or the 32oz? Debating on whether the 48oz would be too big for single servings (because of the wider base), and the 32oz too small for two servings.
Wasn’t sure how many cups of soup the 32oz can handle, and have also read that the underside is harder to clean since its tighter (not the square shape that fits *outside* the guides of the machine).
Thanks!
Hi Andie – so glad the blog post was helpful.
Honestly, it depends on what your servings look like. So, let me give you the measurements/capacity and hopefully, it will help.
The 32-oz container does have a maximum capacity of 32-oz/4 cups, and you can fill it up to the maximum capacity line. The bottom of the 32-oz container is slightly tighter than that of the narrow 64-oz container. I have never had issues cleaning it though. I simply add warm water with a drop of soap into the container and blend. You are right that the bottom is not a square shape, so cleaning it with a hand might be trickier (or even scraping thick blends out of it).
The 48-oz container has the same “bottom” and “top” dimensions as the 64-oz narrow container. However, because the 48-oz container is shorter, it widens faster than the 64-oz narrow container. So, you need a larger quantity of food to blend efficiently.
So, single servings of food are easier to make in the 64-oz narrow container and the 32-oz container. Two servings of food will fit into the 32-oz container (provided one serving of food is only 16-oz/2 cups) but the 48-oz container would be better.
Personally, I can say that my single servings are rather big, so I use the 48-oz container (I use the stainless steel one) even when I am making a smoothie just for myself. However, if I am making nut butter or hummus and don’t want a large amount, I use either the 64-oz narrow container or the 32-oz container. For more than single servings, I always use the 64-oz narrow container or the 48-oz stainless steel.
If you have any questions, please, feel free to reach out.
Thank you so much! You’re right, serving size can vary per person. Really appreciated your breakdown and examples. It helped a ton.
I tested my soup bowls, and it looks like my individual servings range from 1.5 to 2 cups, so a 32oz (in theory) can provide me with two servings. My concern now is whether filling it to max capacity would be pushing it to near overflow when the vortex hits at max speed, especially if I add ingredients toward the end (like chunks of roast chicken).
Thoughts?
Also for ice cream/hummus (stickier stuff), you said the 48oz is easier to clean than the 32oz? My ice cream/nut butter servings are def less than 1.5 cups, so a 48oz might be a no-go, unless I make extras, but cleaning thick sticky batter at the bottom of a 32oz might be a concern.
So torn about this haha!
Hi Andie – I have definitely blended right up the max capacity line in the past and it was fine. However, that was a cold smoothie, not a hot soup. I just thought of something important with regards to hot soups – Vitamix recommends NOT filling the container all the way up when blending hot liquids. Hot food heats up the air above between the food and the blender lid, causing pressure to build up in the container. This pressure can force the lid to shoot off and the hot soup splatter everywhere. So, that’s definitely something to keep in mind. Technically, you could still blend the soup until smooth (just not hot) and heat it up in a pot afterward. But if you are adding already hot ingredients and hot liquid, that might be an issue. Of course, there is always the option of blending in batches.
For cleaning sticky nut butter, I use the Vitamix under-blade scraper – it’s amazing. Another option is to just get as much nut butter out as you can with a regular spatula and then make a smoothie with the rest. I don’t think you have to be too much concerned about the cleaning part since you already have the 64-oz narrow container. The 32-oz container is VERY similar to the 64-oz narrow container and the 48-oz container is even easier to clean.
I know this won’t help you much, but it seems like the 32-oz container would be ideal for your sticky blends while the 48-oz container would be better for your soups. So, the question is whether you are more ok with blending soups in batches (if necessary) or having extra servings of nut butter/hummus.
Hi Petra,
You. Are. Awesome. Thanks for reminding about the pressure build-up when blending hot food. It never crossed my mind since the 64oz is so tall, I never hit max capacity.
Making smoothie out of remaining nut butter in the blender is genius! Also appreciate the underside scraper tips!
If only I’m in the US, I’d gladly get the container and scraper using your affiliate links.
You’ve been a tremendous help. THANK YOU!
I am so happy I could help, Andie! 🙂 Don’t hesitate to reach out if you ever have any questions.
Hi Petra, so I ended up getting the 32oz. The size is perfect portion-wise (woot!), but it does get a bit tricky washing the outside. I didn’t realize how tight the tolerance is between the container’s outerplastic base is to the rotor. I wasn’t able to easily wipe mositure between the nooks and crannies. Sliding a sheet of papertowel helps a tad to syphon the droplets out, but it’s not a perfect solution.
Is it something I should be worried about if I couldn’t keep the space between the plastic and rotor completely dry?
I tend to wash by hand after running a cleaning cycle, just because my recipes are usually oily and still leave some slick residue.
Another basic question, how much frozen fruit can I dump max? I put in 2-3 cups frozen avocado with some water, but at one point the vortex stuck, even using the tamper. I think I accidentally made frozen sherbet at the bottom haha. I wonder if I should have added incrementally? Any tips would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
P.s. the underblade scraper is a Godsend. Thank you for suggesting it!
FYI, looks like when buying the refurb Pro 750, Vitamix claims that the 32-oz container is “This item is not compatible with the Certified Reconditioned Professional Series 750”. This doesn’t make sense, as this container states it is compatible with C- and G-series blenders.
Hi Jason – I haven’t noticed it (when I search the 32-oz container, Vitamix says that it is compatible with all full-size Classic C- or G-Series Vitamix® blenders). What page was it stated on?
For blending larger portions (at least 32oz), do you like the classic 64oz or the low-profile 64oz better?
I’ve only ever owned the classic64, but a cracked bottom means I must replace it now. I almost never fix any less than a 24oz portion, mostly 32-50oz or more, mostly smoothies, shakes and vegetable juices/blends. I like how the slimmer classic64 vigorously draws blends down, but the main problem is that with larger portions it also draws down large air bubbles that get trapped in the blades under the weight of the portion. The blades then spin freely without blending until the machine is stopped and the bubbles released either by stirring with an implement or vigorously tapping the container. Preventing this from happening requires either using the tamper all the time or precise control of the variable speed dial, especially thicker blends with larger portions.
So to ask – Does the wider low-profile 64 container have as much trouble with trapped air bubbles, or does it do better or even overcome this issue? Or have you even noticed this issue with the classic64 container? Regarding *just* performance, when (if ever) would you recommend the low-profile 64 over the classic64?
Hi Xeiran – great questions! If you are making large portions of food, the 64-oz low-profile container wins. I believe that you are talking about air pockets around the blade? If so, I have definitely noticed that happening when blending large amounts of thick soup or hummus in the 64-oz tall container. If I am blending large amounts of food (48-oz and up), I do prefer the 64-oz low-profile container. For small and medium portions of food (less than 48-oz), I like the 64-oz tall container.
So, to answer your question – the 64-oz low-profile container does not have as much trouble with air pockets around the blade when blending large quantities of food. However, it does trap more air bubbles (aka trapping in more air). So, when you are making a large quantity of green smoothie, for example, you will end up with more foam with the low-profile container than with the tall container. The 64-oz tall container is my favorite, but if you are blending mostly medium and large amounts of food, you might be happier with the 64-oz low-profile container.
Please, let me know if you have any more questions.
Which is the quietest model?
Hi Sanda – you can read about it here if you’d like: https://nutritionrefined.com/which-is-the-quietest-vitamix-blender/
To summarize – The Quiet One is by far the quietest of all blenders in the world (64 decibels at maximum speed). The A3500 (metal finish) is four times as loud as the Quiet One, but the quietest out of all non-commercial Vitamix blenders (84 decibels at maximum speed).
Hi, Petra, thank you for all this information about the Vitamix. I have the E320 from Costco with the 64 oz low profile container. I also have the 48 oz dry container, for grains, in case my grain mill stops working.
I saw that you recommend the 32oz wet container for smaller volumes, which I might get.
I was wondering if you familiar with the Vitamix Cookbook from Jodi Berg? I have it on my Kindle but like the recipes so much that I want to have it as a real book. My question is, what kind of container are they using? They don’t mention it in the book, at least I have not seen it.
I would guess the 64 oz tall container ? Would I be able to follow those recipes with my 64 oz low container?
Thank you very much for your help!
Ingrid Scott
Hi Ingrid – I know of the cookbook, but I haven’t seen the recipes. You can easily tell though by looking at the amount of ingredients listed in the cookbook. In this blog post (https://nutritionrefined.com/vitamix-containers/), I talk about all the different Vitamix containers and their capacity (minimum and maximum volume). It’s under the “Vitamix Containers – Size and Capacity” heading. In short, I would think that the recipes in the cookbook are for at least 2-4 people, which would make the 64-oz low-profile container fine to use. If you have any specific recipe you’re not sure about, I am more than happy to look at it.
Hello, have you used the tall 64 ounce container with a Professional 750 Vitamix? I thought perhaps the taller container (with the narrow bottom) would handle smaller quantities better then the shorter, wider container. I just wanted to ensure that there is no problem before buying one. Thank you.
Hi Brian – a great question! Technically, you’re not supposed to be using the tall container (with the 3-inch blade) on a blender base with a 2.2 HP motor. The tall container is designed for 2 HP motors. That said, I always do it and have been for years with no problems. You have probably noticed it in my videos… If you ask Vitamix, they will tell you you’re not supposed to do it. So, it’s up to you.
Hey there! In your article you state that the 32 oz container has a smaller minimum batch size than the 48 oz container (both plastic and stainless steel?). Is this actually true? It makes sense to me since the 48 oz container is barely taller, but I’ve seen many people state that the 32 and 48 oz containers are actually the same width around the bottom, and therefore have the same minimum batch size.
Hi Max – I own both containers and can tell you that they are not the same at the bottom. The 48-oz container is wider, so the minimum batch size is different.
Hi Petra,
We have a very old (2013) 48 oz Vitamix model 5200.
We need to get a replacement lid because we can’t get the garlic & onion smell out of it from a recent batch of gazpacho. We’ve washed it many times with very hot water and have tried the recommended techniques – soaking in vinegar, applying a baking soda paste. My husband doesn’t want to use bleach on it.
The only replacements lids available( after-market only; Vitamix doesn’t sell them) are for 64 oz size.
Do you know if it would fit the 48 oz size of that model?
Thanks so much!
Sheri
Hi Sheri – the 5200 model typically comes with a tall (narrow) 64-oz container. Are you sure yours came with a 48-oz container? I would double-check.
Then, I would reach out directly to Vitamix and ask if they would be willing to send you a replacement lid. Their customer support is amazing, so they might be able to do that. If they can’t, you want to make sure that you’re getting a lid from the same blender series. For example, the lid that comes with the tall 64-oz container (Legacy series) is the same size as the lid that comes with the 48-oz container. However, if you get a lid from the SELF-DETECT container (Ascent series), it won’t snap onto the container because of different locking mechanisms. I just tried it, and it doesn’t work even though they are the same size. Now, if you’re referring to the lid that comes with the low-profile 64-oz container, that will not fit the 48-oz container.
Please let me know if you have any questions!
Which jug/container is best for making pastry?
Thanks
Hi Oliver, the 48-ounce dry container (or the similar 32-ounce dry container for smaller batches) is the best choice for making pastry dough. This is because pastry dough—typically a shortcrust or pie dough made from flour, butter/fat, salt, and water—requires a kneading action to incorporate fats into dry ingredients without overworking them into a tough texture. The dry grains container’s specialized blades create a reverse vortex that pushes ingredients away from the blades, preventing packing, overheating, or uneven mixing, which is ideal for grinding flours and kneading dough.